E3 2011

E3 2011 Aftermath: Battlefield 3 vs. Modern Warfare 3 (Xbox 360)

loading... Flash Player 10 is required to watch this video.

E3 2011 Live Schedule

Download

Choose your preferred download format:

HD H.264 MP4
238.4MB 
Sign In
Hi-Res H.264 MP4
104.6MB 
Sign In
Lo-Res IPOD / PSP
29.7MB 
Sign In
close [x]

378 Comments

  • DrReaper25

    Posted Mar 5, 2012 4:57 pm GMT

    its a super badass game it should get an award from (BUNGIE,MICROSOFT,PLAYSTAYTION) THAT WOULD DO IT HALF JUSTICE

  • aymansito

    Posted Feb 14, 2012 9:42 am GMT

    These type of games would bring life for video games botha are done with an intensive effort backed by a high quality end...thantks a lot for the creators

  • N---E---X

    Posted Nov 16, 2011 9:10 am GMT

    @sandux Well dude i took that pretty offensive, because i cant connect to Xbox live and etc in my country, so yeah i play these games for the singleplayer(mostly, sometimes LAN) but in my opinion MW3 is a better game both in SP and MP, the only good thing BF3 has is better graphics, which i dont really care about because MW3's graphics aren't that bad.

  • sandux

    Posted Oct 27, 2011 2:10 pm GMT

    And lol, wth plays these games for the singleplayer? Thats retarded

  • sandux

    Posted Oct 27, 2011 2:02 pm GMT

    I was a CoD fan boy, but that ended the moment they started charging money for a few maps. This is a FPS and not a payed MMORPG. Never again gonna make the mistake of buying games from Activision. Good luck paying 60E for a game then another 100 for 12maps. Thats pure fun. So BF3 is it for me

  • johnofwar

    Posted Oct 19, 2011 12:58 am GMT

    Bad Company 2 really got me off... well, I hope this one is better than the last game.

  • _Woody_

    Posted Oct 18, 2011 7:03 pm GMT

    i think the fact that you have to pay to play either of these games online is an absolute JOKE. You should never have to pay anything beyond the retail price. ill hire both for the campaigns but EA and IW can jam their subscription where the sun dont shine.

  • xRoYx

    Posted Oct 16, 2011 8:26 pm GMT

    Yea this is what we need...pitting fans against each other over a couple of amazing videogames

  • 33kit

    Posted Oct 13, 2011 12:47 pm GMT

    nothing better then battlefield3 in the world wide earth

  • SalahDinThe2nD

    Posted Oct 8, 2011 1:30 am GMT

    What Happen To Medal of Honor?

  • cthumann

    Posted Sep 30, 2011 7:51 am GMT

    What's wrong with saying they both look great and I will enjoy them both equally? Why does one have to be "better"? Thank them both for the fun times ahead.

  • aaronfhff123 posted Sep 26, 2011 2:44 pm GMT (does not meet display criteria. sign in to show)

    aaronfhff123

    Posted Sep 26, 2011 2:44 pm GMT (hide)

    Both games are very over rated and over hyped.

  • masakri50

    Posted Sep 25, 2011 5:38 pm GMT

    obvious flame bait gamespot.

  • moathfaleh_94

    Posted Sep 23, 2011 3:14 am GMT

    Bf3 rule

  • pop-warriorwith

    Posted Sep 18, 2011 12:58 am GMT

    Battlefield ONLY .

  • AqUaBlaDe123

    Posted Sep 14, 2011 9:22 pm GMT

    What the hell? Battlefield surpassed Modern Warfare years ago. Modern Warfare is recycled

  • padhand

    Posted Sep 14, 2011 7:02 am GMT

    The solo campaign in modern warfare has always been enjoyable but the online battles on battlefield are epic and more realistic.

  • maximo

    Posted Sep 9, 2011 4:54 am GMT

    I will get both games because I think both games will be amazing in their own rights. For me personally though I loved BF2, it just offers a top notch experience in the sense of the scale and design of the maps, destructible environments, vehicles, and just the sense of 'reality' plus I love the fact that you can spawn on your teammates.

  • lamok0516

    Posted Sep 8, 2011 10:35 pm GMT

    @nambar
    i played BFBC2 and i believe its playing on 30 fps on console..Am i going to switch to MW2 or BO for that reason? NO, because i had so much fun and its the best experience i have ever had playing online..playing on PC is absolutely the ultimate experience, no question about it, playing @ 60 FPS and with 64 players max..but i can't afford upgrading my PC every time "GREAT GAMES" are developed..its not me, i have family to feed, and that's my PRIORITY..

    PS.MW3 @ 60 FPS vs. BF3 @30 FPS (I'll go with BF3 because of the overall experience it offers) i really don't mind playing @ 30 FPS 'coz there's a saying "Every Great Players DO ADJUST to every situations"

  • namdar

    Posted Sep 8, 2011 10:04 pm GMT

    @lamok0516 I can understand that bad company 2 plays well on consoles , I use to play bad company 1 on console , but frostbite 2.0 is being tweaked so you can still play atmost 30 FPS on console and for people who are use to playing mw2 and black ops have handled higher FPS, EA wants cod fans to switch to battlefield fans, however I just think cod fans wont ultimately buy the game or play it alot because of this reason. Besides PC version of BF3 boasts 64 player combat where as console only 24... Sure you get the battlefield experience but it wont be anywhere near experience you will get on PC.

  • lamok0516

    Posted Sep 8, 2011 7:14 pm GMT

    @namdar
    "There is a good possiblity that the console ver of bf3 will not be as fun as mw3"

    i doubt it..i played BFBC2 in console and its hell of a fun compared to mw2..i played mw2 first then eventually BFBC2..check this out, http://bfbc2.statsverse.com/stats/ps3/CrazyMilkman_/
    PS.if you want fun, play with us on console you'll see what i mean..

  • namdar

    Posted Sep 8, 2011 6:32 pm GMT

    @charles1432juli that's so interesting how you said that , I was thinking the same thing when I heard that too. There is a good possiblity that the console ver of bf3 will not be as fun as mw3. But I highly doubt you will see alot of mw3 pc players.

  • Metalshin0bi

    Posted Sep 8, 2011 12:35 pm GMT

    I played Bad Company 2 after playing a lot of MW2 and honestly, I think MW2's game style infected me way more than Bad Company. I did play BC2 a lot though, just so I can say I gave it a fair play. I was just addicted to MW2, my first COD experience I might add. There were a lot of great things about BC2 though, that COD does not have, but it all boiled down to game play for me. Then I played Black Ops... For like 2 days. Good thing I borrowed it from a friend and did not pay a dime for BO. It is pretty crappy in my opinion.

    And then there is MW3... I think I will pass on it because it is the same as MW2 in a lot of ways. More tweaks yes, but nothing too different, which is disappointing. BF players tell me that BF3 will absolutely be better than BC2 and I think I can see that for sure. BF frankly bored me with BC2 but BF3 is going to make me a believer. Can't wait.

  • lamok0516

    Posted Sep 6, 2011 6:23 pm GMT

    @charles1432juli
    "I think bf3 and mw3 will be great"

    i agree with you on BF3 but i don't think the word "GREAT" is appropriate for MW3..
    watch this : ( http://asia.gamespot.com/shows/now-playing/?event=now_playing_modern_warfare_320110902&tag=videos%3Btitle%3B1

  • Tacoholic23

    Posted Sep 2, 2011 7:39 pm GMT

    I think these types of online multiplayer games should be more dependent on how your team works together to win the game, just makes it a lot more fun and rewarding that getting a new perk, CoD is just too easy imo...

  • charles1432juli

    Posted Aug 29, 2011 9:32 pm GMT

    I think bf3 and mw3 will be great im a "fan boy" of both but everyone and I mean everyone is comparing bf3 to mw3 but no one seems to understand they are comparing pc bf3 to mw3 console wait to you but bf3 console to mw3 console then talk and I may be wrong but I heard bf3 on console is 30 frame a sec mw3 is 60 hmmmmmm

  • fremis

    Posted Aug 29, 2011 12:49 pm GMT

    in my opinion i think bf3 is gunna have the upper hand cause the huge thing is that mw3 is like the same game every year unlike battlefield 3 its something new plus it comes out a month earlier

  • johnofwar

    Posted Aug 26, 2011 12:27 am GMT

    People keep comparing Battlefield 3 to Modern Warfare 3. When it has big differences. I'll clear it out Battlefield 3 = More serious warfare, Modern Warfare 3 = More fun arcade-style warfare. You guys really still have to compare the game >_>

  • shadokil92

    Posted Aug 21, 2011 8:09 pm GMT

    DO you want to play a fps or play around on vehicles

  • warbrady

    Posted Aug 18, 2011 2:18 am GMT

    must have both games

  • masakri50

    Posted Aug 17, 2011 1:38 pm GMT

    it seems theres alot of bf fan boys running amock based on the ratings. i have both cod and bf and the difference is one you play as a commando with years and years of training and the other youre a grunt. if you look at it that way it all makes alot more sense.

  • x_SLiDeBLaD3_x

    Posted Aug 17, 2011 11:53 am GMT

    What is this question ??? Reality vs Simulator ?? Who wins???

  • seed7alfa posted Aug 14, 2011 6:44 am GMT (does not meet display criteria. sign in to show)

    seed7alfa

    Posted Aug 14, 2011 6:44 am GMT (hide)

    i'm not COD fanboy,i just don't like battelfield.it's MW3 for me

  • carbon247

    Posted Aug 13, 2011 2:35 pm GMT

    Battlefield = is more realistic and alot more open
    MW = is alot more enjoyable and alot more customizable

  • tamerelias96

    Posted Aug 12, 2011 11:05 am GMT

    i think the bf3 is better.. but i'll be getting both games

  • axi96

    Posted Aug 7, 2011 7:08 am GMT

    I have played MW2 and Bad Company2 ... both games are awesome, but I'm fan of Battlefield . i think battlefield 3 gonna be better simulator than MW3 . if I can I will play both of the games ...

  • lamok0516

    Posted Aug 5, 2011 6:56 pm GMT

    @Razor4884

    cool!!! lol : )

  • Razor4884

    Posted Aug 5, 2011 12:25 pm GMT

    I found this funny and wanted to show it to you guys (if you haven't seen it already)

    http://gamingirresponsibly.com/the-world-after-battlefield-3modern-warfare-3

  • Jake518

    Posted Aug 4, 2011 11:55 am GMT

    Without a doubt, BF 3 is gonna be better.

  • thefright007 posted Aug 1, 2011 8:38 pm GMT (does not meet display criteria. sign in to show)

    thefright007

    Posted Aug 1, 2011 8:38 pm GMT (hide)

    just mw3 its so so so good Always best shooter game just mw333333333

  • mad-at-nintendo

    Posted Jul 31, 2011 6:55 pm GMT

    i already played mw3 it was called mw2

  • CEmarine88 posted Jul 31, 2011 4:54 pm GMT (does not meet display criteria. sign in to show)

    CEmarine88

    Posted Jul 31, 2011 4:54 pm GMT (hide)

    MW3 is going to be horrible, but people are still going to love it because they worship infinity ward. COME ON!!!! give treyarch some credit, they beat iw when it comes to maps and perks!

  • Khazrak134

    Posted Jul 30, 2011 12:30 pm GMT

    meh... im gettin both

  • DarkNinja09

    Posted Jul 29, 2011 7:05 pm GMT

    i want mw3 only cause of the campaign and my freinds play it, and i want to pwn some little kids , but bf3 is the true military shooter people want, mw3 = wait for price drop and have for with friends??? idk man but mw3 is not worth 60 bucks.. -_-

  • Ssgt-BlackRifle

    Posted Jul 27, 2011 11:43 pm GMT

    sorry MW3 good game but am not going to play COD games no more, its clear that people will never change their gameplay all everyone understands is camping is the best why to win but am not gonna waste $60 on this game Battlefield 3 am wait for you =)

  • aussie_man18

    Posted Jul 27, 2011 11:42 pm GMT

    Battlefield 3=massive multiplayer with tons of vehicles, amazing graphics, realistic weaponry, incredible destruction, hand to hand combat, awesome sound quality, extremely realistic battlefields, awesome locations and more!

    Modern Warfare 3=lots of guns, fake weaponry, no destruction, no vehicles, no improvements on Modern Warfare 2!

  • jake12373

    Posted Jul 27, 2011 12:19 am GMT

    The last COD was dissapointing, Not one sniper stage, The last medal of honour Afganistan topped it with I never thought I would see the day, Battlefield 3 will be better than CODMW3 also...watch!